求這五個觀點的壞處啊.中文英文都可以.

題目：

求這五個觀點的壞處啊.中文英文都可以.
1:right to keep and bear arms
2:protection against improper search
3:right to a jury trial
4:tight to counsel
5:right to petition the government

解答：

1、容易傷人（或反被壞人利用）
2、科學發展進度緩慢
3、錯誤判斷（判決）,好人被冤枉or壞人被釋放
4、錯誤判斷錯誤指導
5、一旦發現自己有問題容易在政府中失去個人信譽
再問： 可以稍微詳細一些麼？
再答： 您的意思是……？
再問： 就是 稍微詳細一點， 比如說第五個和第四個。
再答： 4、Some states extend the right to counsel to all matters where a defendant's liberty interest is threatened. The New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously held that, regardless of whether the proceeding is labeled as civil, criminal, or administrative, if a defendant faces a loss of liberty, she or he is entitled to appointed counsel if indigent. 5、(WIKI )These restrictions infringe on the constitutionally protected right to sue the government,[4] and the right of individuals, groups, and corporations (via corporate personhood), to lobby[1] the government. Another controversial bill, the Executive Branch Reform Act, H.R. 984, would require over 8,000 Executive Branch officials to report into a public database nearly any "significant contact" from any "private party", a term that the bill defines to include almost all persons other than government officials. The bill defines "significant contact" to be any "oral or written communication (including electronic communication) . . . in which the private party seeks to influence official action by any officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States." This covers all forms of communication, one way or two ways, including letters, faxes, e-mails, phone messages, and petitions. The bill is supported by some organizations as an expansion of "government in the sunshine", but other groups oppose it as an infringing on the right to petition by making it impossible for citizens to communicate their views on controversial issues to government officials without those communications becoming a matter of public record.[5][6][7]
再問： 謝謝 那第一第二第三個呢
再答： 1、They argue that the Second Amendment's words "right of the people" mean "a right of the state" — apparently overlooking the impact of those same words when used in the First and Fourth Amendments. The "right of the people" to assemble or to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures is not contested as an individual guarantee. Still they ignore consistency and claim that the right to "bear arms" relates only to military uses. This not only violates a consistent constitutional reading of "right of the people" but also ignores that the second amendment protects a right to "keep" arms. "When our ancestors forged a land "conceived in liberty", they did so with musket and rifle. When they reacted to attempts to dissolve their free institutions, and established their identity as a free nation, they did so as a nation of armed freemen. When they sought to record forever a guarantee of their rights, they devoted one full amendment out of ten to nothing but the protection of their right to keep and bear arms against governmental interference. Under my chairmanship the Subcommittee on the Constitution will concern itself with a proper recognition of, and respect for, this right most valued by free men."[43] 2、 in the absence of strong suspicion, any search, especially a strip-search, is utterly unacceptable. Personal searches are required to be carried out in private and by officials of the same gender. Also, the provision of alternate clothing for the accused while the search is being carried out is a must. The use of 「sniffer dogs」 when a reasonable suspicion exists that a student is carrying drugs is allowed. 您再追問一下，字數達到限制了